The boundaries of biology are shifting faster than regulations can keep up. In a groundbreaking development, researchers have successfully grown mouse embryos using only stem cells. This process eliminates the need for sperm, eggs, or a biological womb. While this scientific milestone offers unprecedented opportunities for medical research, it forces society to confront difficult questions about the definition of life.
For decades, the recipe for creating an embryo was unchangeable. It required an egg from a female and sperm from a male. In late 2022 and throughout 2023, teams led by Professor Jacob Hanna at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz at the University of Cambridge shattered this rule.
These research teams took mouse stem cells and coaxed them into self-assembling into structures that mimic embryos. The results were startlingly accurate. By day 8.5 of development (roughly halfway through a mouse’s gestation period), these synthetic models displayed:
These were not merely clumps of cells. They were organized, functioning biological entities grown inside rotating glass vials that served as mechanical wombs.
The science relies on “naive” stem cells, which are cells that have not yet decided what they will become. Scientists chemically treat these cells to divide them into three distinct groups:
When placed together in the mechanical uterus, these cells self-organized. The breakthrough proved that the instructions for building an organism are contained entirely within the stem cells, needing no external biological trigger like fertilization to start the process.
Scientists argue that these synthetic embryos, often called “embryo models” or “stembryos,” are essential for solving medical mysteries. The period immediately after a fertilized egg implants in the uterus is known as the “black box” of development. It is almost impossible to observe in humans and difficult to track in animals.
By creating these models, researchers hope to achieve several goals:
Despite the medical potential, the creation of synthetic embryos has triggered a massive ethical debate. The central issue is categorization. If an entity has a beating heart and a developing brain, is it a life form?
For decades, the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) upheld a “14-day rule.” This guideline stated that scientists could not culture human embryos in a lab beyond 14 days after fertilization. This limit was chosen because it marks the point where the “primitive streak” appears, signaling the beginning of distinct body formation.
Synthetic embryos complicate this rule. Since they were never fertilized, they fall into a legal gray area. They are technically not embryos in the legal sense, yet they mimic the biological behavior of one. In response to these advances, the ISSCR recently relaxed the 14-day rule, allowing for case-by-case review, but clear laws have not yet replaced these guidelines.
The mouse experiments proved that synthetic embryos could reach the organ-development stage. While current technology cannot grow these models into full-term living animals (the mouse embryos died shortly after day 8.5), the gap is closing.
Ethicists worry about the slippery slope toward human application. If scientists can select specific stem cells to create an embryo, it raises concerns about eugenics and “designer” biology. There is also the question of pain. If a synthetic embryo develops a nervous system, is it capable of suffering? Current consensus suggests that at such early stages, pain perception is impossible, but as the models survive longer, this answer may change.
As of now, no country has specific legislation governing synthetic embryos created solely from stem cells. The United States restricts federal funding for research involving human embryos, but these restrictions technically apply to embryos created via fertilization. Private funding faces fewer barriers.
In the UK, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act regulates the use of embryos, but definitions in the text rely on the presence of fertilization. This leaves synthetic models in a regulatory blind spot that lawmakers are currently rushing to fill.
Are synthetic embryos clones? In a way, yes. If the stem cells come from a single adult mouse, the resulting synthetic embryo is genetically identical to that adult. However, the goal is usually to study developmental biology rather than to produce a copy of an animal.
Can these embryos grow into full animals? No. At this stage, the synthetic mouse embryos eventually developed defects and died after day 8.5. They cannot currently be implanted into a real womb, nor can the mechanical womb support them to full term.
Has this been done with human cells? Yes. In June 2023, researchers announced the creation of synthetic human embryo models that mimic the blastocyst stage (about 14 days of development). These models do not have a heartbeat or the potential to become a baby, but they are sophisticated enough to study early genetic disorders.
Do synthetic embryos require a female host? No. The entire process occurs outside a body. The mouse experiments utilized a mechanical device that controls air pressure and rotates the fluid to simulate the environment of a uterus.